Gadgets
Now Reading
Lenovo Mirage Solo VR Headset review
0

Lenovo Mirage Solo VR Headset review

by adminMay 5, 2018

Virtual reality has two places to go right now: go cheap, or push the boundaries. The Oculus Go was the former, getting in the door at $199 all-in. Lenovo’s Google-powered Mirage Solo is the latter.

The Mirage Solo, like the Oculus Go, is also a standalone VR headset, no phone or PC required. But it’s a little different. Its tech pushes more for where the future of VR will eventually be. But at $399, it also costs twice the price. And the Mirage Solo isn’t a full step to the future: it’s a half one. I’ll explain.

The Mirage Solo is now available, a year after it was announced at Google’s 2017 developer conference. After wearing it for a few days, I can already tell you that, while it shows where VR is heading, there’s no reason to buy the Mirage Solo at launch.

21-lenovo-mirage-solo-with-daydream
No phone, no PC
Sarah Tew/CNET

VR, cutting the cord

The Mirage Solo looks like a VR headset you’d use on a desktop PC, or even the PlayStation VR: a padded display with lenses, attached to an adjustable visor ($237.64 at Amazon.com) you tighten around your head. Much like most Microsoft Mixed Reality VR headsets released last year, the Mirage Solo has a similar design. It even looks a bit like Lenovo’s PC-connected wired VR headset.

Mirage Solo is totally standalone, but only the second device to ever be completely PC or phone-free — Oculus Go is the first. Unlike the Oculus Go, however, there isn’t even a phone app to pair with. Just plug it in, charge it up, turn it on and set it up, and you’re set.

Google has its own phone-connected VR goggles, Daydream View, that work with a selection of Android phones and offer up basic VR much like the Samsung Gear VR. The Mirage Solo runs on similar software, but with a few key extras. The biggest is it allows some level of room tracking, enabling movement similar to what PC-connected VR and the PlayStation VR are capable of. It does this through two fish-eye cameras on the front of the headset (called inside-out tracking).

Inside the box, there’s the headset, a little motion-enabled controller that’s exactly like the one that comes with Google’s Daydream View.

Leaning and moving, just a bit

The Mirage Solo’s biggest trick is tracking motion in space, something called 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF). Using motion sensors (gyro, accelerometer) plus two wide-angle cameras on the front of the headset, it can track your movement. Ducking, leaning, stepping: This is the stuff the Oculus Go, Samsung Gear VR and Daydream View cannot do.

This is the first mobile headset that’s had this kind of tracking, and yes, it’s basically the same tech that’s in Microsoft’s PC-based VR headsets. No room sensors are needed. I tried it at my desk, in the office cafeteria, at my train station, outdoors and even on a train (don’t do that: vehicle motion makes the tracking drift).

Sometimes, it’s amazing. Virtual Virtual Reality is a game (also on the Oculus Go) that feels incredibly immersive. The sense of “being there” is definitely enhanced with the headset’s usually good extra camera-based tracking.

There’s a drawback, though: the range of movement is super-limited to just a couple of feet in any direction. If I take more than about two steps, the VR world fades to black and a message tells me to step back into my VR zone. Google says the reason for this is safety and comfort. The Mirage Solo has no ability to recognize obstacles in the world around me. But it can recognize where the ground is, and can learn to ignore people walking nearby to keep tracking smooth.

The extra degrees of movement do make the VR feel more comfortable: when in Google’s Arts and Culture art museum, I can lean into a piece of art. In BBC’s tour of life on Earth, I can peek around the edges of a cartoon 3D otter. I can bend down to examine something. I can duck snowballs being thrown at me.

Credit: CNET

What's your reaction?
Awesome
0%
Good
0%
Average
0%
Bad
0%
Not Good
0%
About The Author
admin

Leave a Response